Alignment for Progress: 
A National Strategy for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

It’s time for a meaningful national conversation about mental health and substance use care. We must remove the barriers to equitable and available coverage for these conditions so people can get the help they need.

Welcome To The 
National Strategy

Want to understand more about the importance of building a National Strategy for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders?

How Content Is Organized and How Best to Search/Sort the Recommendations

The National Strategy recommendations are organized by category, with impacted populations and topical areas providing additional nuance and the ability to narrow a search. We have also included the option to search recommendations by the relevant House and Senate committees of jurisdiction.

Recommendation Selection Methodologies and Criteria

After conducting a thorough review of the federal policy landscape, The Kennedy Forum team created this first-of-its-kind compilation of policy recommendations needed to transform our mental health and substance use systems. The recommendations have been sourced and vetted from numerous organizations, advocates, and experts across the country in order to capture a robust set of recommendations for lawmakers and federal agencies to act on.

All National Strategy Recommendations

These featured recommendations are highlighted based on their importance in beginning the national movement towards better care for everyone.

submit
Clear All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
Clear all
Topics
Areas of Focus
Population
Federal Department
Social Determinants of Health
Coverage & Standards
House Committees
Senate Committees
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
LOADING more RECOMMENDATIONS
No results found.
If you see a loading symbol on your screen, more results are on the way! Otherwise, try different search/filter criteria.

Fully implement the SERVE Act

The Department of Defense (DoD) should fully implement the Supporting Eating Disorders Recovery Through Vital Expansion (SERVE) Act, which allows for inpatient and outpatient treatment for eating disorders under TRICARE for dependants and active military personnel, and use its existing authorities to expand eating disorder treatment coverage to retired military families.[1][2][3]

Rates of eating disorders among military members are increasing, and their families also have higher rates of eating disorders than the civilian population.[2] Congress passed the Fiscal Year 2022 National Defense Authorization Act with language from the SERVE Act, which requires expansion of treatment under TRICARE and provide additional coverage for Veterans and their families.[1][4] This coverage expansion was supposed to take effect on October 1, 2022, but the Department of Defense (DoD) has yet to implement these changes.[3] To ensure military personnel, retired military, and their families have access to eating disorder treatment, the DoD should fully implement the SERVE Act without delay.[1][2[][3]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Preserve patient protections in the ACA

Patient protections in the Affordable Care Act (ACA), including the law’s preventive services mandate (USPSTF), should be preserved.[1]

Since its passage, the ACA has dramatically expanded access to affordable health insurance and healthcare services.[2] The ACA also mandated coverage for various preventive services, such as routine screenings for diseases or conditions.[3] These screening services must be provided by most private health plans without copay or coinsurance, regardless of whether a person’s annual deductible has been met.[3] The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) regularly provides updated guidance on mandated preventive services and currently recommends screening for depression in the adult and adolescent population, particularly for those who are pregnant or elderly. The USPSTF also recommends screening and counseling for adults and adolescent populations for unhealthy alcohol use.[4] In an ongoing court case, Braidwood Management v. Becerra, a group of plaintiffs are challenging the ACA requirement to cover preventive services designated by the USPSTF - arguing the mandate is unconstitutional.[5] Access to preventive services must be preserved, including critical screenings for mental health and substance use disorders. The Department of Justice should vigorously defend this latest attack on the ACA and, should protections afforded by the ACA be undone by the courts, Congress should act quickly to restore these protections.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the Nutrition CARE Act

Congress should pass the Nutrition CARE Act, which would add coverage of medical nutrition therapy services for individuals with eating disorders to Medicare.[1][2]

Eating disorders affect an estimated 9 percent of the population and often co-occur with other mental health conditions [3] and have among the highest mortality rates of all mental health and substance use disorders.[4] Eating disorders affect all age groups, including older adults enrolled in Medicare. Medical nutrition therapy is a nutrition-based treatment that also includes counseling services, and has been shown to have positive outcomes for individuals with an eating disorder.[5][6] Unfortunately, about 70 percent of individuals with an eating disorder are unable to receive treatment due to limited insurance coverage.[7] Currently, Medicare Part B only covers medical nutrition therapy for individuals who have been diagnosed with diabetes or kidney disease.[8] The passage of the Nutrition CARE Act would increase access to medical nutrition therapy for Medicare beneficiaries with an eating disorder. [1][2]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Include mental health support in COOPs

Federal entities that have oversight of agencies with essential workers, such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, should include resources, funding, and guidance for mental health, emotional stress, and trauma support in Continuity of Operations Plans.[1]

Continuity of Operations Plans (COOPs) clearly outlines how an organization will continue to perform its essential functions during a disaster or emergency.[2][3] While critical to ensure workers can get back to work quickly and safely, these plans often fail to address employees’ mental health needs.[3] Essential workers are at an increased risk for job-related trauma and for developing mental health conditions and substance use disorders.[4] As recommended by the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention’s “Action Plan for Strengthening Mental Health and the Prevention of Suicide in the Aftermath of COVID-19,” including plans to address employee needs related to mental health, emotional stress, and trauma support in COOPs can help improve the overall health of essential workers during a crisis.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the Farmers First Act

Congress should pass the Farmers First Act of 2023 to reauthorize the Farm and Ranch Stress Assistance Network (FRSAN), which would increase funding for the program, authorizing $15 million per year for the program for the next five years, up from $10 million.[1]

Individuals involved in agricultural work or farming often encounter many challenges that may impact their mental health. Challenges related to volatile agricultural commodities markets, weather and even climate change can contribute to the stressors on farmers and agricultural workers. At the same time, there is often a shortage of healthcare providers to address the needs of agricultural communities. The American Psychological Association notes that rural areas experience shortages of mental health care providers and stigma around mental health.[2]

The FRSAN program connects farmers, ranchers, and other agriculture workers to stress assistance programs and resources. Through FRSAN, state departments of agriculture, state extension services, and non-profits receive funding to establish helplines, provide suicide prevention training for farm advocates, and create support groups for farmers and farm workers. Under the Farmers First Act, departments of agriculture across many states and non-profit organizations are provided the necessary funding to establish helplines, suicide prevention training for farm advocates, and support groups.[3] Congress should prioritize reauthorizing this important program serving the mental health needs of farming communities.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Require FQHCs to align with core integrated care measures

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should require Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) to align with core integrated care measures and ensure accountability, particularly with respect to health disparities. Dedicated funding should be provided to implement the requirement.[1]

FQHCs frequently serve socially and economically marginalized communities. FQHCs must report on quality measures associated with mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUDs), including depression screenings, brief alcohol interventions, and depression remissions.[1][2] However, they are not required to use the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) core quality measures for publicly funded health plans.[3][4] Clinical experts have raised concerns about the efficacy of existing FQHC reporting requirements, particularly in addressing disparate health outcomes in marginalized communities.[1] HHS should mandate that FQHCs align with CMS’ core measures to address health disparities. Implementation of these reporting requirements should be appropriately funded. [1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Have a Question About the Strategy? Want to Get Involved?

If you'd like to provide input to future iterations of the National Strategy, ask a question about our recommendations, or make an organizational commitment to the Alignment for Progress, please reach out today.

Diverse Workforce
Research & Technology
Parity, Coverage, & Equitable Access
Emergency & Crisis Response
Prevention, Early Intervention, & Youth
Infrastructure
Environmental Justice
Employment
Transportation
Education
Food Security
Housing Security
Economic Security
Youth
Women
Veterans
Sexual and Gender Minorities/LGBTQ+
Legal System-Involved Individuals
Rural Communities
People with Physical Disabilities
Older Adults
People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Immigrants/Refugees
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African American
People with Autism
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Active Military
Federal Employee Health Plans
TRICARE
Individual ACA Plans
Employer Sponsored Plans
CHIP
Medicare
Medicaid
Support Services
Telehealth
Integration
Measurement-based Care
Value-based Care
Remedies for Violations
Network Adequacy/Timely Access
Medical Necessity Determinations
Covered Benefits
Parity/Treatment Limitations
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Veterans Affairs
Treasury
Labor
Justice
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeland Security
Health and Human Services
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Education
Defense
Commerce
Agriculture
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
House Veterans' Affairs Committee
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
House Small Business Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
House Natural Resources Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
House Financial Services Committee
House Appropriations Committee
House Agriculture Committee
House Education and Workforce Committee
House Budget Committee
House Energy and Commerce Committee
House Armed Services Committee
Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
Senate Finance Committee
Senate Indian Affairs Committee
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Senate Armed Services Committee
Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Senate Budget Committee
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee