Alignment for Progress: 
A National Strategy for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

It’s time for a meaningful national conversation about mental health and substance use care. We must remove the barriers to equitable and available coverage for these conditions so people can get the help they need.

Welcome To The 
National Strategy

Want to understand more about the importance of building a National Strategy for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders?

How Content Is Organized and How Best to Search/Sort the Recommendations

The National Strategy recommendations are organized by category, with impacted populations and topical areas providing additional nuance and the ability to narrow a search. We have also included the option to search recommendations by the relevant House and Senate committees of jurisdiction.

Recommendation Selection Methodologies and Criteria

After conducting a thorough review of the federal policy landscape, The Kennedy Forum team created this first-of-its-kind compilation of policy recommendations needed to transform our mental health and substance use systems. The recommendations have been sourced and vetted from numerous organizations, advocates, and experts across the country in order to capture a robust set of recommendations for lawmakers and federal agencies to act on.

All National Strategy Recommendations

These featured recommendations are highlighted based on their importance in beginning the national movement towards better care for everyone.

submit
Clear All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
Clear all
Topics
Areas of Focus
Population
Federal Department
Social Determinants of Health
Coverage & Standards
House Committees
Senate Committees
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
LOADING more RECOMMENDATIONS
No results found.
If you see a loading symbol on your screen, more results are on the way! Otherwise, try different search/filter criteria.

Protect LGBTQ+ rights

The Executive Branch should continue to fight anti-LGBTQ+ laws enacted at the state or local level that violate federal law or the U.S. Constitution and harm LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly youth.

Amidst attacks on LGBTQ+ individuals by many state and local governments across the country,[1] President Biden signed an Executive Order on Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals on June 15, 2022.[2] The Executive Order directs federal agencies to take steps to protect LGBTQ+ individuals from unlawful discrimination and eliminate disparities that harm them and their families, including safeguarding health care access and suicide prevention programs and supporting LGBTQ+ children and families in the foster care system. The Executive Order is consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in employment. It also builds on the previous Executive Order of January 20, 2021, which extended the Bostock ruling to other federal laws that prohibit sex discrimination.[3]

Approximately two-thirds of LGBTQ+ people have reported experiencing discrimination in their lives, which can negatively impact their mental health, increasing their risk of depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, and self-harm.[4] According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), LGBTQ+ adults are more likely to experience mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUD) than heterosexual adults.[5] LGBTQ+ youth are also at a higher risk of harassment, abuse, homelessness, and suicide.[6] Research has shown that lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals living in states with comprehensive legal protections have higher self-rated health than those in states without these protections. The federal government should use all tools at its disposal to protect LGBTQ+ individuals from these continued assaults.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Require the use of diagnostic classification systems

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) should require Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to use the Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood (DC:0-3R or DC:0-5) for diagnosis payment and utilization review purposes.[1]

Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are at an increased risk for developing other mental health or substance use disorders (MH/SUDs).[2] IDD usually develops or presents in early childhood, and early diagnosis and intervention can lead to better outcomes.[3] To aid in early diagnosis, in 1994, Zero to Three developed a guide known as the Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood (DC:0-3), which was most recently updated in 2021 (DC:0-5).[4] With over 42 million children receiving coverage from Medicaid and CHIP, a recent survey asked states if their policies required or recommended the use of DC:0-5 or DC:0-3R.[5] However, only seven states require the use of the diagnostic classification, and only eight states recommend its use.[5] The use of age-specific diagnostic systems should be required for payment and utilization review purposes to improve access to needed care.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the Moms Matter Act

Congress should pass the Moms Matter Act, which establishes grant programs to address maternal mental health conditions and substance use disorders during or after pregnancy, with a focus on racial and ethnic minority groups.[1][2][3]

The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate of any high-income country.[4][5][6] Mental health and substance use disorders are one of the leading causes of pregnancy-related death,[6][7][8] and are the most common complications of pregnancy and childbirth, impacting 800,000 women annually.[9] Low-income, Black, and other marginalized families are disproportionately affected.[10][11] Significantly, Black women experience maternal death at a rate 2.5 times higher than white women.[11]

The bipartisan Moms Matter Act, one of the thirteen bills within the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act,[4][12] would invest in programs supporting moms with maternal health conditions and substance use disorders and provide critical funding to grow and diversify the maternal mental and behavioral health workforce.[1][2][3] It would make critical investments in the social determinants of health, including housing, transportation, and nutrition, that contribute to high maternal mortality among Black women, Veterans, incarcerated people, Native Americans, and other people of color.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the Worker Relief and Credit Reform Act

Congress should pass the Worker Relief and Credit Reform Act (WRCR Act), which would reform the Earned Income Tax Credit to better meet the needs of workers by expanding eligibility criteria, increasing credit amounts, and creating more efficient and effective means of getting benefits to low- to moderate-income workers and families.[1][2]

Research shows that income insecurity among children and adults can significantly contribute to mental health disorders.[3] The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) provides qualified low to moderate-income workers and families with a tax break that varies with specific criteria, like income, marital status, number of children or dependents, and disability.[4] Pre-COVID-19 pandemic data demonstrate that the EITC lifts people above the poverty line—more than 5.5 million people, including nearly 3 million children.[5] In the 2021 tax year, 31 million workers and families received about $64 billion in EITC thanks to expanded eligibility criteria passed by Congress as part of the American Rescue Plan Act.[6]

The Worker Relief and Credit Reform Act (WRCR Act) would build upon the ARPA expansions and change the EITC criteria to better reflect the current economic conditions of students, workers, caregivers, and the elderly.[1] Proposed reforms include recognizing caregiving and higher education as work, expanding the eligibility age range, and providing taxpayers with assistance, safeguards, and educational and outreach programs.[1] Congress should pass the WRCR Act to lift more people out of poverty, improving the mental health individuals and families.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Ensure access to public assistance for the previously incarcerated

Congress should ensure that federally funded public assistance, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), to previously incarcerated individuals who face barriers during reentry. In addition, federal prisons should provide every person leaving custody with a reentry plan that includes initial appointments and contact information for mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) treatment services and supportive housing.[1][2]

Previously incarcerated individuals receive inadequate assistance and resources as they re-enter their communities, which puts them at increased risk for being rearrested.[1] Many states ban incarcerated individuals from eligibility for public assistance programs that provide access to food or affordable housing.[1][3] Without access to these programs, recidivism and substance use is higher.[1] Congress should prohibit states from restricting access to previously incarcerated individuals.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Expand the Maternal Opioid Misuse (MOM) model

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Innovation Center (CMMI) should expand the Maternal Opioid Misuse (MOM) model to other substance use disorders (SUDs), including stimulant and alcohol use disorders.

Substance use is a leading cause of death in pregnant women and contributes to birth-related complications, including preterm labor. Pregnant people with SUDs often lack access to prenatal and postpartum health care. Additionally, many substance use treatment programs do not accept pregnant clients and/or Medicaid beneficiaries, while maternity care providers often do not have experience with SUDs. These gaps lead to a lack of  evidence-based SUD care for pregnant and postpartum individuals.

The MOM model addresses gaps in care for pregnant and postpartum Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid use disorder. The MOM model provides coordinated and integrated physical health care, behavioral healthcare, and wrap-around services. State Medicaid agencies implement the model with community providers, including hospitals and Medicaid managed care organizations. The MOM model includes services such as well-woman care, medications for opioid use disorder, prenatal and postpartum care, labor and delivery, and neonatal/ infant care.

CMS should expand the coordinated, wraparound care provided in the MOM model to pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries who have other SUDs, such as alcohol use disorder and stimulant use disorder, for which coordinated care is beneficial.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Have a Question About the Strategy? Want to Get Involved?

If you'd like to provide input to future iterations of the National Strategy, ask a question about our recommendations, or make an organizational commitment to the Alignment for Progress, please reach out today.

Diverse Workforce
Research & Technology
Parity, Coverage, & Equitable Access
Emergency & Crisis Response
Prevention, Early Intervention, & Youth
Infrastructure
Environmental Justice
Employment
Transportation
Education
Food Security
Housing Security
Economic Security
Youth
Women
Veterans
Sexual and Gender Minorities/LGBTQ+
Legal System-Involved Individuals
Rural Communities
People with Physical Disabilities
Older Adults
People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Immigrants/Refugees
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African American
People with Autism
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Active Military
Federal Employee Health Plans
TRICARE
Individual ACA Plans
Employer Sponsored Plans
CHIP
Medicare
Medicaid
Support Services
Telehealth
Integration
Measurement-based Care
Value-based Care
Remedies for Violations
Network Adequacy/Timely Access
Medical Necessity Determinations
Covered Benefits
Parity/Treatment Limitations
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Veterans Affairs
Treasury
Labor
Justice
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeland Security
Health and Human Services
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Education
Defense
Commerce
Agriculture
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
House Veterans' Affairs Committee
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
House Small Business Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
House Natural Resources Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
House Financial Services Committee
House Appropriations Committee
House Agriculture Committee
House Budget Committee
House Education and Workforce Committee
House Energy and Commerce Committee
House Armed Services Committee
Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
Senate Finance Committee
Senate Indian Affairs Committee
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Senate Armed Services Committee
Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Senate Budget Committee
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee