Alignment for Progress: 
A National Strategy for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

It’s time for a meaningful national conversation about mental health and substance use care. We must remove the barriers to equitable and available coverage for these conditions so people can get the help they need.

Welcome To The 
National Strategy

Want to understand more about the importance of building a National Strategy for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders?

How Content Is Organized and How Best to Search/Sort the Recommendations

The National Strategy recommendations are organized by category, with impacted populations and topical areas providing additional nuance and the ability to narrow a search. We have also included the option to search recommendations by the relevant House and Senate committees of jurisdiction.

Recommendation Selection Methodologies and Criteria

After conducting a thorough review of the federal policy landscape, The Kennedy Forum team created this first-of-its-kind compilation of policy recommendations needed to transform our mental health and substance use systems. The recommendations have been sourced and vetted from numerous organizations, advocates, and experts across the country in order to capture a robust set of recommendations for lawmakers and federal agencies to act on.

All National Strategy Recommendations

These featured recommendations are highlighted based on their importance in beginning the national movement towards better care for everyone.

submit
Clear All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
Clear all
Topics
Areas of Focus
Population
Federal Department
Social Determinants of Health
Coverage & Standards
House Committees
Senate Committees
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
LOADING more RECOMMENDATIONS
No results found.
If you see a loading symbol on your screen, more results are on the way! Otherwise, try different search/filter criteria.

Fund violence intervention programs

Congress should pass legislation such as the RISE from Trauma Act to dedicate funding to Group Violence Intervention (GVI) programs, Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programs (HVIPs), and street outreach.

Gun violence is a major public health challenge in the U.S. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were over 45,000 firearm-related deaths in the U.S. in 2020. Suicides accounted for a majority of all firearm-related deaths, while homicides accounted for over 40 percent. Gun violence also disproportionately impacts Black, American Indian, and Latino populations.[1]

Community-based violence intervention programs attempt to prevent gun violence by targeting those at high risk of being involved. Some of the main program models include GVI programs, HVIPs, and street outreach. GVI programs have individuals at risk for violence meet with community members, social service organizations, and law enforcement to educate them about the consequences of gun violence while also offering social services. HVIPs intervene with patients while they are still in the hospital to minimize the possibility of retribution while also offering individuals social services similar to those in GVI programs. Street outreach programs utilize outreach workers within the community to proactively prevent gun violence through conflict mediation.[2]

The RISE from Trauma Act would support these programs by providing $600 million in funding through a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant program for community-based organizations involved with trauma intervention. The Act would also create another HHS grant program to fund hospital-based trauma interventions such as HVIPs.[3]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the People Over Parking Act

Congress should pass the People Over Parking Act, which would eliminate requirements that residential and commercial developments near public transit be forced to have parking.[1] This government mandate negatively impacts housing development and affordability, public transit use, the environment[2] – and contributes to homelessness.

There are at least three parking spaces for each of the estimated 260 million cars in the United States.[3] Municipalities often have minimum parking mandates that require parking spaces for every building.[4] Parking minimum mandates have vast unintended consequences, worsening housing affordability, congestion, and climate change.[3] Related outcomes of minimum parking mandates include increased housing costs and pollution emissions and reduced building development and public transit use.[2]

Housing insecurity, which includes lack of affordable housing, overcrowded conditions, and homelessness, exposes individuals and families to increased stress, negatively impacting mental and physical health.[5] For individuals with mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUDs), housing insecurity exacerbates a cycle of MH/SUDs symptoms and discrimination that contribute to the overrepresentation of those experiencing homelessness also having MH/SUDs.[6] Congress should pass the People Over Parking Act to mitigate the negative impacts of parking minimum mandates, especially on those suffering from MH/SUDs.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Develop an early identification campaign for developmental delays

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should develop an early identification campaign for mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUDs) that is similar to the agency’s "Learn the Signs. Act Early. Program," which focuses on learning and knowing the signs of developmental delays in children.[1]

Nearly one in three adults have a mental health or substance use disorder (MH/SUD), yet many do not receive any treatment.[2] Screenings and assessments are critical to identifying MH/SUDs and increasing early treatment.[3] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed a program, “Learn the Signs. Act Early.” that provides support materials for parents on childrens’ developmental stages so they can better identify developmental delays.[4] In addition, the program provides a tracker for parents to monitor developmental milestones, and resources are available in case there is a concern for developmental delays.[5] A similar program should be developed so family members and caregivers can be aware of the signs of an MH/SUD that may be developing so that they can seek care for their loved ones.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Require gun waiting periods

To prevent suicides and other gun-related violence, Congress should pass legislation to require gun buyers to wait 7 to 10 days before accessing a gun they have purchased.

Tragically, 90 percent of suicide attempts with guns are fatal, whereas 4 percent of suicide attempts not made with firearms end in death. Many individuals who die by gun suicide act impulsively and could have been saved by a waiting period for gun purchases.[1][2] A waiting period requires gun buyers to wait a certain amount of time before taking possession of a firearm they have purchased. The waiting period allows time for a background check, a cooling-off period, and an intervention or counseling for individuals who may be in distress.[2]

Waiting periods have proven to reduce firearm suicides by creating a buffer of time that can save lives. They are also supported by most Americans, including gun owners. However, only 10 states and the District of Columbia have waiting periods for all or some types of firearms.[3] The federal government does not require a waiting period for gun purchases, except for cases where a background check is delayed for up to 3 days.[2] Requiring gun buyers to wait 7 to 10 days before accessing a gun they have purchased would provide sufficient time for background checks and cooling-off periods.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Support college recovery programs

The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) should identify successful college recovery programs, including "recovery housing" on college campuses, and provide support and technical assistance to increase the number and capacity of high-quality programs to help students in recovery.[1]

Young adults aged 18 to 25 have the highest rates of substance use disorders (SUDs), including alcohol use disorder, compared to other age groups.[2] Collegiate Recovery Programs (CRP) provide supportive environments within campus culture for college and university students in recovery from SUDs.[3] There are more than 150 CRPs on college and university campuses nationally.[3] However, the diversity of models and practices has not been well documented.[4] Identifying best practices, which include dedicated space, trained staff, programs supporting recovery, and peer support,[3] and providing support and technical assistance, should be a priority for the ONDCP, SAMHSA, and DOE to increase the number and capacity of CRPs.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Amend Head Start to include mental health programs

Congress should amend the Head Start Act so the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary is required to prioritize programs that support evidence-based trauma-informed programs, age-appropriate positive behavioral interventions and supports, early childhood mental health consultation, and prevention of suspension and expulsion.[1]

Each year, Head Start programs serve more than 1 million children ages birth to five and pregnant people through federally-funded grantee organizations.[2] The Office of Head Start provides guidance to grantees on using quality improvement funds to support Head Start teachers in addressing behavioral challenges and potential mental health conditions.[3] Previously proposed legislation sought funding and requirements for the Health and Human Services Secretary to identify, review, and implement effective, evidence-based interventions that improve children’s mental health in Head Start programs.[4][5][6] Congress should amend the Head Start Act to prioritize support for evidence-based, trauma-informed programs, age-appropriate interventions, and mental health screenings.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Have a Question About the Strategy? Want to Get Involved?

If you'd like to provide input to future iterations of the National Strategy, ask a question about our recommendations, or make an organizational commitment to the Alignment for Progress, please reach out today.

Diverse Workforce
Research & Technology
Parity, Coverage, & Equitable Access
Emergency & Crisis Response
Prevention, Early Intervention, & Youth
Infrastructure
Environmental Justice
Employment
Transportation
Education
Food Security
Housing Security
Economic Security
Youth
Women
Veterans
Sexual and Gender Minorities/LGBTQ+
Legal System-Involved Individuals
Rural Communities
People with Physical Disabilities
Older Adults
People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Immigrants/Refugees
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African American
People with Autism
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Active Military
Federal Employee Health Plans
TRICARE
Individual ACA Plans
Employer Sponsored Plans
CHIP
Medicare
Medicaid
Support Services
Telehealth
Integration
Measurement-based Care
Value-based Care
Remedies for Violations
Network Adequacy/Timely Access
Medical Necessity Determinations
Covered Benefits
Parity/Treatment Limitations
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Veterans Affairs
Treasury
Labor
Justice
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeland Security
Health and Human Services
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Education
Defense
Commerce
Agriculture
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
House Veterans' Affairs Committee
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
House Small Business Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
House Natural Resources Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
House Financial Services Committee
House Appropriations Committee
House Agriculture Committee
House Education and Workforce Committee
House Budget Committee
House Energy and Commerce Committee
House Armed Services Committee
Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
Senate Finance Committee
Senate Indian Affairs Committee
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Senate Armed Services Committee
Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Senate Budget Committee
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee