Alignment for Progress: 
A National Strategy for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

It’s time for a meaningful national conversation about mental health and substance use care. We must remove the barriers to equitable and available coverage for these conditions so people can get the help they need.

Welcome To The 
National Strategy

Want to understand more about the importance of building a National Strategy for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders?

How Content Is Organized and How Best to Search/Sort the Recommendations

The National Strategy recommendations are organized by category, with impacted populations and topical areas providing additional nuance and the ability to narrow a search. We have also included the option to search recommendations by the relevant House and Senate committees of jurisdiction.

Recommendation Selection Methodologies and Criteria

After conducting a thorough review of the federal policy landscape, The Kennedy Forum team created this first-of-its-kind compilation of policy recommendations needed to transform our mental health and substance use systems. The recommendations have been sourced and vetted from numerous organizations, advocates, and experts across the country in order to capture a robust set of recommendations for lawmakers and federal agencies to act on.

All National Strategy Recommendations

These featured recommendations are highlighted based on their importance in beginning the national movement towards better care for everyone.

submit
Clear All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
Clear all
Topics
Areas of Focus
Population
Federal Department
Social Determinants of Health
Coverage & Standards
House Committees
Senate Committees
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
LOADING more RECOMMENDATIONS
No results found.
If you see a loading symbol on your screen, more results are on the way! Otherwise, try different search/filter criteria.

Fund research on black youth mental health and suicide

Congress should appropriate additional funding to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute on Mental Health (NIMH) to fund additional research on Black youth mental health and suicide.[1]

According to a report from the Congressional Black Caucus, the suicide death rate among Black youth is increasing faster than any other racial/ethnic group.[1] From 2000 to 2020, Black youth ages 10-19 also experienced the largest increase in suicide rates, 78 percent. And in a research study among the youngest children — ages 5-12 — Black youth were approximately two times more likely to die by suicide than their White counterparts.[2]

Historically, a small amount of research funding has been committed by the NIH, and specifically the NIMH, to investigate Black youth mental health and suicide increases.[1] In response to the growing concern over Black youth suicide, in June 2020 the NIMH released a notice of special interest to encourage research focused on Black child and adolescent suicide.[3] The notice outlines a number of research areas that could receive funding, including: epidemiology, etiology, and trajectories; intervention and services research; preventive interventions; treatment interventions; and services interventions.[3] This was followed by a Funding Opportunity Announcment (FOA) released in March 2022 with the aim to advance translational research to better understand factors that confer risk and resilience for suicide among Black youth.[4]

Continued investment in this space is needed. Congressional appropriators should provide NIH/NIMH with the resources they need to continue to fund research on Black youth suicide. Research areas of focus should include, but not be limited to:

  • Risk and protective factors for suicidal behaviors among Black youth;
  • Mental health motivation, utilization, and engagement among Black youth with an emphasis on examining motivation for mental health treatment;
  • Risk and protective factors, as well as mental health utilization and engagement, among Black LGBTQ+/SGL (same gender loving) youth;
  • Practical, systemic, and cultural barriers to treatment; the effectiveness of depression screenings by professionals across healthcare professions and institutions for helping to identify Black youth at risk for suicide;
  • The effect of social media usage on Black youth; and
  • Evidence-based interventions relating to mental health and suicide risk; in particular, those that are age-appropriate and culturally and linguistically relevant for Black youth.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Keep families together

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and the Administration on Children Youth and Families (ACYF) should disseminate best practices for states regarding interventions and strategies to keep families together when it can be done safely (e.g., using a relative for kinship care).[1][2][3]

An estimated 2.7 million children live with kin caregivers.[3] Individuals who care for a child whose parent(s) cannot, who are related to the child by blood, marriage, or adoption, or who have “an emotionally significant relationship” with the child are considered relative, kin, or fictive kin foster family (“kin caregivers”).[4] Prioritizing placing children entering foster care with kin caregivers instead of non-relative foster families[5], when it can be done safely, is preferred because it is usually best for children to remain with family, which reduces trauma and placement disruptions.[6] The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and the Administration on Children Youth and Families (ACYF) should provide additional and more proactive guidance on best practices and technical assistance.[1][2][3]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the Pride in Mental Health Act

Congress should pass the Pride in Mental Health Act, which would direct the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to survey the mental health of LGBTQ+ youth to better understand their mental health and incidences of child abuse and neglect.[1][2] The bill would also improve mental health support for LGBTQ+ youth by developing new resources, training for caregivers, and school bullying prevention guidelines.[1][2]

LGBTQ+ youth report challenges with bullying, feeling sad or hopeless, and experiencing other mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUD) at a higher rate than their non-LGBTQ+ peers.[3] Many LGBTQ+ youths may have to navigate an environment that might not be inclusive, or accepting of their sexual orientation or gender identity (SOGI) - especially within their families. [4] Family rejection, neglect, and abuse can lead to MH/SUDs.[4] These challenges have resulted in LGBTQ+ youth being overrepresented in the child welfare system and increase the chances of LGBTQ+ youth encountering homelessness.[5] Congress should pass the Pride in Mental Health Act to address the unique mental health needs of this population, especially those deriving from incidences of child abuse and neglect.[1][2]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

Congress should fully fund the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) to ensure that all eligible children, including those with serious mental health conditions, receive the special education services they need to succeed academically.[1][2]

Approximately one in six U.S. children aged 6-17 experience a mental health disorder each year,[3][4] and the number of youth diagnosed with anxiety and depression has been increasing steadily.[5] The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides appropriate public education to eligible children with disabilities, including those with serious mental health conditions, and ensures access to special education and related services.[6] More than 7.5 million infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities are eligible for early intervention, special education, and related services through IDEA.[6]

When passed in 1975, IDEA was to cover 40 percent of the increased costs of special education.[7] Yet, funding never reached that level and currently covers just 14.6 percent of the cost.[7] Funding for programs and resources through the Act has declined for nearly two decades.[8] As the number of children with serious mental health conditions increases, it is increasingly critical that the IDEA is fully funded so they can receive special education services.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Collect eating disorder data through the YRBSS

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) should once again collect eating disorder data through its Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS).[1]

For over two decades, the CDC collected three questions relating to unhealthy weight control practices, but these questions were removed in 2015.[2] The most recent data is now over a decade old, even though eating disorders are among the deadliest mental health conditions[3], and emergency department admissions for eating disorders have increased dramatically for youth during the COVID-19 pandemic.[4] YRBSS is unique in its national scope and comprehensive behavior data collection in youth across the nation. It is also more representative of the national population, whereas other sources often overrepresent white and higher-income populations. The lack of current data has stymied research into eating disorders and hindered our public health response to recent increases.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Include MH/SUD in FEMA disaster planning and response

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) should include mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) screening, supports, and services in all pandemic and natural disaster planning and response efforts.[1]

In a disaster or pandemic, people often suffer serious mental or emotional distress, which may exacerbate existing mental health or substance use disorders (MH/SUD).[2] For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. adults reported elevated adverse mental health conditions, and some populations – including young adults and racial/ethnic minorities – experienced disproportionately worse mental health outcomes, increased substance use, and elevated suicidal ideation.[3][4]

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the agency responsible for helping people before, during, and after disasters,[4] addresses these behavioral health needs. FEMA’s National Response Framework guides how the nation responds to disasters and emergencies,[5] including the planning and coordination of Federal public health, healthcare delivery, and emergency response systems.[6] The inclusion of screening, supports, and services in pandemic and natural disaster response efforts provides evidence-informed care at the earliest possible point of intervention, either during or immediately after a disaster, which is key to treating every person at risk of or with early signs of MH/SUD.[1] Supports could include SAMHSA’s Disaster Distress Helpline,[7] which provides counseling to those in emotional distress; the Disaster Technical Assistance Center,[8] which prepares communities to deliver an effective MH/SUD-related response; and the Disaster Mobile App,[9] which provides resources to behavioral health first responders to better serve those experiencing distress during disaster events.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Have a Question About the Strategy? Want to Get Involved?

If you'd like to provide input to future iterations of the National Strategy, ask a question about our recommendations, or make an organizational commitment to the Alignment for Progress, please reach out today.

Diverse Workforce
Research & Technology
Parity, Coverage, & Equitable Access
Emergency & Crisis Response
Prevention, Early Intervention, & Youth
Infrastructure
Environmental Justice
Employment
Transportation
Education
Food Security
Housing Security
Economic Security
Youth
Women
Veterans
Sexual and Gender Minorities/LGBTQ+
Legal System-Involved Individuals
Rural Communities
People with Physical Disabilities
Older Adults
People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Immigrants/Refugees
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African American
People with Autism
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Active Military
Federal Employee Health Plans
TRICARE
Individual ACA Plans
Employer Sponsored Plans
CHIP
Medicare
Medicaid
Support Services
Telehealth
Integration
Measurement-based Care
Value-based Care
Remedies for Violations
Network Adequacy/Timely Access
Medical Necessity Determinations
Covered Benefits
Parity/Treatment Limitations
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Veterans Affairs
Treasury
Labor
Justice
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeland Security
Health and Human Services
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Education
Defense
Commerce
Agriculture
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
House Veterans' Affairs Committee
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
House Small Business Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
House Natural Resources Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
House Financial Services Committee
House Appropriations Committee
House Agriculture Committee
House Budget Committee
House Education and Workforce Committee
House Energy and Commerce Committee
House Armed Services Committee
Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
Senate Finance Committee
Senate Indian Affairs Committee
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Senate Armed Services Committee
Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Senate Budget Committee
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee