Alignment for Progress: 
A National Strategy for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

It’s time for a meaningful national conversation about mental health and substance use care. We must remove the barriers to equitable and available coverage for these conditions so people can get the help they need.

Welcome To The 
National Strategy

Want to understand more about the importance of building a National Strategy for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders?

How Content Is Organized and How Best to Search/Sort the Recommendations

The National Strategy recommendations are organized by category, with impacted populations and topical areas providing additional nuance and the ability to narrow a search. We have also included the option to search recommendations by the relevant House and Senate committees of jurisdiction.

Recommendation Selection Methodologies and Criteria

After conducting a thorough review of the federal policy landscape, The Kennedy Forum team created this first-of-its-kind compilation of policy recommendations needed to transform our mental health and substance use systems. The recommendations have been sourced and vetted from numerous organizations, advocates, and experts across the country in order to capture a robust set of recommendations for lawmakers and federal agencies to act on.

All National Strategy Recommendations

These featured recommendations are highlighted based on their importance in beginning the national movement towards better care for everyone.

submit
Clear All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
Clear all
Topics
Areas of Focus
Population
Federal Department
Social Determinants of Health
Coverage & Standards
House Committees
Senate Committees
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
LOADING more RECOMMENDATIONS
No results found.
If you see a loading symbol on your screen, more results are on the way! Otherwise, try different search/filter criteria.

Fund the community schoolyards project

Congress should establish federal funding for the Community Schoolyards project through the National Park Service’s (NPS) Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) to renovate asphalt schoolyards into schoolyard parks by providing grants to school districts, city parks, and water departments to fund renovations with oversight from federal agencies.

The Community Schoolyards project is an initiative that aims to transform asphalt schoolyards into green spaces that can serve as public parks and outdoor recreation areas for urban communities. The project is based on the idea that schoolyards are a valuable but underutilized resource that can benefit students, families, and neighbors, such as improving health, education, equity, and climate resilience.[1]

According to Trust for Public Land, parks are essential for healthy, equitable communities, but across America, 100 million people - including 28 million children, do not have a park close to home. This means they miss out on the physical, mental, and social benefits of spending time in nature. In our biggest cities, communities of color have access to 44 percent less park space than majority white communities.[2] This creates environmental injustices and health disparities that affect people’s quality of life and well-being. Nationwide, 36 percent of public school students attend school in heat islands, which negatively impacts cognitive development and can cause heat stress in children.[2] A growing body of research also connects extreme heat – which is even worse in urban heat islands – to increases in attempted and completed suicides, depression, substance use, and hospitalizations for mental health conditions.[3]

Gaps in park access and the effects of urban heat islands can be addressed by turning existing public schoolyards into vibrant, shared outdoor spaces that benefit the entire community. American public schools own a combined two million acres of land with much of it remaining closed to the public outside of school hours. If every public schoolyard in the U.S. functioned as a shared outdoor space, 20 million more people, including over 5 million children, would have access to a park within a 10-minute walk of home.[2] This would significantly improve the quality of life and well-being of millions of Americans, especially those who live in underserved communities.Green schoolyards can provide multiple benefits for students and communities, such as improving physical and mental health, enhancing academic performance and attendance, increasing prosocial behavior, reducing crime and violence, and mitigating urban heat islands and stormwater runoff.[2][4] Access to green spaces in childhood has also been shown to protect against the development of many mental health disorders in adolescence and adulthood. One of the most significant benefits is psychological restoration, which can help prevent stress-related issues, depression, and mood disorders.[5]The ORLP grant program is a nationally competitive program funded through the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF). The program targets grant assistance to urban areas with little or no access to publicly available outdoor recreation spaces.[6] The program is administered by the NPS and is an ideal mechanism for codifying the Community Schoolyards initiative at the federal level. The program aligns with the goals and objectives of the initiative by prioritizing projects that create new or reinvigorate parks in economically disadvantaged areas.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the Strengthen Kids’ Mental Health Now Act

Congress should pass legislation like the Strengthen Kids’ Mental Health Now Act to increase community-based provider rates and expand the capacity and availability of pediatric mental health services.

Children’s mental health is a critical issue that affects millions of families in the United States. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, more than 14 million children and adolescents in the United States have a diagnosable mental health condition.[1] Using data from the 2016 National Survey on Children’s Health, researchers at the University of Michigan also found that only half of children with mental health conditions were receiving treatment.[2] Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the mental health crisis among children, with increased rates of anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders.[3] Many communities lack enough options for children’s mental health treatment, and often children do not receive the care they need, which can lead to more severe mental health problems. Consequently, children’s hospitals are seeing more children in crisis who are “boarding,” or waiting in hospitals (often emergency departments) for suitable care placements to open up.[4]

The Strengthen Kids’ Mental Health Now Act would improve access and quality of mental health care for children and adolescents by increasing community-based provider rates for pediatric mental health services. The bill would also improve state implementation of Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT), a Medicaid coverage requirement that provides comprehensive and preventive health care services for children under age 21, to improve accessibility to pediatric mental health and substance use services that EPSDT guarantees, but often fails to deliver.[5]

The legislation also identifies the regulatory and legal hurdles that prevent providers from increasing their ability to provide pediatric mental health services and encourages existing flexibilities states can use to broaden mental health services, while creating a new Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) grant program to improve community-based pediatric mental health services and help communities implement or develop new programs and policies that suit the mental health needs of children and adolescents. Additionally, the bill aims to establish a new HRSA workforce grant program that focuses on strengthening the pediatric mental health workforce, through more training for the current workforce and focused investment in the recruitment, retention, and diversity of future pediatric mental health professionals. Finally, the bill proposes to create a HRSA program that aims to enhance vital pediatric mental health infrastructure and expand our national ability to deliver suitable care for children with more intensive treatment needs.[5]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the Protect Moms from Domestic Violence Act

Congress should direct resources (research, grants, guidance) to domestic violence and intimate partner violence (IPV) by passing the Protect Moms from Domestic Violence Act.

Domestic and sexual violence have damaging long-term mental health effects on both mothers and their children. About 20 percent of people who survive IPV experience new mental health disorders as a result of the abuse, including major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and a wide range of substance use disorders (SUDs).[1] Tragically, more than 50 percent of female homicide victims are killed due to some type of IPV.

Congress should pass the Protect Moms from Domestic Violence Act, which would address IPV during pregnancy by requiring the Department of Health and Human Services to study maternal mortality and morbidity due to IPV, with recommendations on best practices for reducing maternal mortality due to IPV. The bill would also require the National Academy of Medicine to study whether various forms of violence increase the risk of suicide, SUDs, and drug overdose among pregnant and postpartum people. Finally, the bill would provide grants to nonprofit and community-based organizations to improve maternal and child outcomes of IPV victims.[2]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Prohibit use of Title I funds for zero-tolerance policies

Federal Title I education funds should not be used to support policies that foster unhealthy school climates such as zero-tolerance policies and school resource officers. Title 1 education funds should instead be used for school with social-emotional learning (SEL) programs, such as the Responsive Classroom from the Center for Responsive Schools, and executive function training programs like the ACTIVATE program in all schools.[1]

School “zero-tolerance” policies, many of which were imposed in the 1990s, for discipline encourage a strict approach, increasing the number of expulsions and suspensions for actions ranging from possessing weapons or drugs to fighting and swearing.[2][3] However, research has shown that zero-tolerance punishment is ineffective in changing student behavior and that proactively engaging students has more productive and cost-effective outcomes than punitive actions.[1][2][3][4][5]

SEL and executive function programs have proven to be an effective means for positively influencing student behaviors.[3][5] SEL programs, like the Responsive Classroom approach to teaching, engage students in developing academic, social, and emotional skills in a safe and responsive learning environment.[6] Executive function training programs like ACTIVATE improve cognitive function for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism, or other learning disorders.[7] Using Federal Title I education funds, schools should replace zero-tolerance policies with SEL and executive function training programs.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Ensure schools can receive youth peer support services

The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) and Department of Education (DOE) should ensure schools are an eligible entity for receiving youth peer support services by issuing clarifying guidance and updating its administrative claiming guide to ensure youth peer support models are a permissible school-based service. CMS and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) should offer learning collaboratives and technical assistance to states on peer support and billing best practices.

Peer support programming for youth and young people can effectively provide mental health support outside of traditional healthcare systems and can support culture change within healthcare systems. It is a trauma-informed practice recognized by SAMHSA that can help youth and young people manage their physical and mental health, build support networks, and engage in services.[1] Peer support is a priority outlined in President Biden’s 2022 Presidential Unity Agenda, and SAMHSA has issued National Model Standards for Peer Support Certification for local, state, federal, and tribal partners. [2][3]

Peer support is a Medicaid-covered service in over 45 states and reimbursable by the Veterans Administration. In 2013, CMS and SAMHSA issued an Informational Bulletin providing guidance to states on how to establish peer support services as a Medicaid benefit for children, youth, and young adults with “significant behavioral health conditions.” [4] Still, Medicaid funding for youth peer support is commonly funded under state Medicaid waivers, limiting available funding to a small percentage of high-need youth.[5] School-based health centers that are designated federally qualified health centers can also receive increased federal matching funds for providing Medicaid-approved mental health services like youth peer support but often express confusion about how to seek those funds. Similarly, school districts are often not familiar with how to properly bill Medicaid for peer support services – either provided by the school or by a peer hired by the school, community mental health center or provider, or other school-linked community organizations.[5] The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act invests in school-based services through Elementary and Secondary Education Act grants. However, it is unclear that youth peer support may be implemented with this funding.[6]

CMS and the DOE should ensure schools and states are aware that youth peer support programs may be implemented and expanded and should provide guidance to states on billing for peer services. CMS should update its administrative claiming guide with information about claiming and billing for youth peer support, with additional guidance on the topics of parental consent and alignment with provider requirements. CMS should also issue clarifying guidance that people under 18 years old can be provided peer support by another person under the age of 18. Guidance should discuss both Medicaid reimbursement pathways through managed care organizations and Medicaid fee-for-service reimbursement. CMS and SAMHSA should additionally offer learning collaboratives and technical assistance to states on peer support implementation and billing best practices and offer learning communities.[5]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the ASSIST Act

Congress should pass the Advancing Student Services in Schools Today (ASSIST) Act, which would increase school-based provider rates and expand the availability of mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) care in schools.

Schools play a vital role in preventing, identifying early, and addressing students’ mental health and substance use challenges, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, many schools lack adequate resources and staff to provide effective and accessible MH/SUD services and supports.[1]

The ASSIST Act would establish a new grant program at the Department of Health and Human Services to help schools and school-based health centers hire and retain qualified MH/SUD providers, such as counselors, social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists. The ASSIST Act would also permanently increase the federal government’s share of Medicaid reimbursement of school-based services, including MH/SUD care, to 90 percent.[2] This would help states sustainably increase the rate of pay for school-based providers, which would help reduce provider shortages and turnover. A higher Medicaid reimbursement rate would also reduce the administrative burden on schools and states to claim Medicaid reimbursement for school-based services.

By passing the ASSIST Act, Congress can make a significant investment in the mental health and well-being of our nation’s students. School-based MH/SUD care can improve access to care, allow for early identification and treatment of MH/SUD challenges, reduce stigma and discrimination, and promote academic achievement and positive youth development.[3] The ASSIST Act would help ensure that every student has access to the behavioral health services they need to thrive.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Have a Question About the Strategy? Want to Get Involved?

If you'd like to provide input to future iterations of the National Strategy, ask a question about our recommendations, or make an organizational commitment to the Alignment for Progress, please reach out today.

Diverse Workforce
Research & Technology
Parity, Coverage, & Equitable Access
Emergency & Crisis Response
Prevention, Early Intervention, & Youth
Infrastructure
Environmental Justice
Employment
Transportation
Education
Food Security
Housing Security
Economic Security
Youth
Women
Veterans
Sexual and Gender Minorities/LGBTQ+
Legal System-Involved Individuals
Rural Communities
People with Physical Disabilities
Older Adults
People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Immigrants/Refugees
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African American
People with Autism
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Active Military
Federal Employee Health Plans
TRICARE
Individual ACA Plans
Employer Sponsored Plans
CHIP
Medicare
Medicaid
Support Services
Telehealth
Integration
Measurement-based Care
Value-based Care
Remedies for Violations
Network Adequacy/Timely Access
Medical Necessity Determinations
Covered Benefits
Parity/Treatment Limitations
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Veterans Affairs
Treasury
Labor
Justice
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeland Security
Health and Human Services
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Education
Defense
Commerce
Agriculture
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
House Veterans' Affairs Committee
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
House Small Business Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
House Natural Resources Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
House Financial Services Committee
House Appropriations Committee
House Agriculture Committee
House Budget Committee
House Education and Workforce Committee
House Energy and Commerce Committee
House Armed Services Committee
Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
Senate Finance Committee
Senate Indian Affairs Committee
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Senate Armed Services Committee
Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Senate Budget Committee
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee