Alignment for Progress: 
A National Strategy for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

It’s time for a meaningful national conversation about mental health and substance use care. We must remove the barriers to equitable and available coverage for these conditions so people can get the help they need.

Welcome To The 
National Strategy

Want to understand more about the importance of building a National Strategy for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders?

How Content Is Organized and How Best to Search/Sort the Recommendations

The National Strategy recommendations are organized by category, with impacted populations and topical areas providing additional nuance and the ability to narrow a search. We have also included the option to search recommendations by the relevant House and Senate committees of jurisdiction.

Recommendation Selection Methodologies and Criteria

After conducting a thorough review of the federal policy landscape, The Kennedy Forum team created this first-of-its-kind compilation of policy recommendations needed to transform our mental health and substance use systems. The recommendations have been sourced and vetted from numerous organizations, advocates, and experts across the country in order to capture a robust set of recommendations for lawmakers and federal agencies to act on.

All National Strategy Recommendations

These featured recommendations are highlighted based on their importance in beginning the national movement towards better care for everyone.

submit
Clear All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
Clear all
Topics
Areas of Focus
Population
Federal Department
Social Determinants of Health
Coverage & Standards
House Committees
Senate Committees
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
LOADING more RECOMMENDATIONS
No results found.
If you see a loading symbol on your screen, more results are on the way! Otherwise, try different search/filter criteria.

Levy excise taxes on plans violating the federal parity law

The U.S. Department of Treasury should exercise its existing authority under 26 U.S.C. § 4980D to levy excise taxes on health plans that violate the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA).[1]

MHPAEA requires equity in coverage between mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUDs) and medical/surgical benefits.[2][3] When passed in 2008, the MHPAEA applied only to group health plans and group health insurance.[2][3] However, in 2010, the Affordable Care Act amended the law to include the individual health insurance market.[2][3] While the MHPAEA has significantly improved access to MH/SUD coverage for millions of Americans, the Department of Labor, in coordination with state regulators, has uncovered numerous health plans in violation of MHPAEA.[4] Everyone deserves equal coverage of mental health and addiction treatment services, and the Department of Treasury’s failure to use its existing authority has weakened the ability to enforce the law.[5] It should utilize its existing authority to levy taxes on plans in violation of the MHPAEA.[1][3]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Encourage the use of the P-COAT alternative payment model

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should encourage the use of the Patient-centered Opioid Addiction Treatment (P-COAT) alternative payment model, which is designed to improve outcomes and reduce spending for opioid addiction by using three bundled payments: 1) Patient Assessment and Treatment Planning bundle; 2) Initiation of Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) bundle; and 3) Maintenance of MAT bundle.[1]

Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD), particularly when coupled with therapy and support services (collectively often referred to Medication-Assisted Treatment, or MAT) has been effective in treating opioid use disorder (OUD), but cost can be a barrier to accessing treatment.[2][3] Siloed healthcare can also be a barrier for people to obtain the treatment they need. Patients with OUD who are not treated effectively with MAT can add billions of collars in costs to the healthcare system (e.g. increased frequency of emergency department visits and preventable hospital admissions.[4] Medicare is currently the only insurance that offers a bundled payment option for opioid treatment programs (OTP) that helps coordinate and connect care for patients with OUD.[5] The Patient-centered Opioid Addiction Treatment (P-COAT) payment model is designed to improve treatment outcomes with coordinated care, control costs, and ensure appropriate reimbursement rates through bundled payments.[4] There are three bundles, including Patient Assessment and Treatment Planning, Initiation of MAT, and Maintenance of MAT. Each is a payment focused on the different components of OUD treatment covering evaluation and diagnosis, initial outpatient MAT and support services, and ongoing treatment.[6] P-COAT should be used as alternative payment model for OUD treatment to enhance care coordination, improve health outcomes, and lower costs. [1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Fund the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment program

Congress should increase appropriations for the Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program established by 34 U.S.C. § 10421 and amend 34 U.S.C. § 10422 so grant awards are contingent upon the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT).[1]

The Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) program includes grants to state, local and tribal prisons and jails to provide mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) treatment and resources to incarcerated adults and youth.[2] To receive funding, grant recipients must provide aftercare services to individuals who participate in MH/SUD treatment and services while incarcerated.[3] These services include education, job training, and peer, self-help, and half-way house programs.[4] The “Residential Substance Use Disorder Treatment Act,” as introduced in the 118th Congress, expands residential SUD treatment programs under RSAT to include the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT).[5] In addition to aftercare services, eligibility for grants made through the RSAT program should be contingent upon the use of MAT.[1][6]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Improve care and treatment of pregnant prisoners

The Department of Justice (DOJ) should establish federal requirements for the trauma-informed care and treatment of pregnant prisoners or prisoners who are primary caretakers with mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUD). Congress should provide whatever additional authority the Department needs to establish such requirements.[1][2]

Pregnant women who are incarcerated are more likely to have mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUD) than the general population.[3] Unfortunately, these individuals do not consistently receive the care they need, including medication to treat SUDs.[4] In addition to SUD treatment, pregnant women who are incarcerated often need care for mental health conditions, such as postpartum depression or depression related to pregnancy.[2] Many incarcerated individuals are primary caretakers,[5] and incarcerated parents experience higher rates of depression, anxiety, and increased stress due to the lack of contact and forced separation from their children.[6] Informed care for pregnant women and primary caregivers who are incarcerated, including adequate screenings and treatment for MH/SUD issues, should be a mandatory federal requirement.[1][2]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Incorporate psychiatric impairments into IADLs

Congress should require the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to work with mental health stakeholders to examine how instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) could incorporate psychiatric impairments.[1]

Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) are the activities we do every day to maintain an independent lifestyle and are a crucial tool for assessing and ensuring quality of life.[2] They include cooking, cleaning, transportation, laundry, and financial management.[3] IADLs are traditionally closely associated with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) which are concerned with basic self-care skills such as eating, bathing, and mobility; and both are used by occupational therapists to determine the balance of independence and support a person needs when recovering from a physical or cognitive injury, or older adults facing physical or cognitive decline.[3] While IADLs are assessed for all hospitalized patients, individuals with a mental health or substance use disorder (MH/SUD) may experience challenges beyond IADLs. MH/SUDs can impair a person’s ability to make and hold appointments, shop for basic necessities, and other activities that impact quality of life. Additionally, their IADLs may never be assessed if they are never hospitalized. Those experiencing MH/SUD could benefit from the support IADL assessments and support services offer.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Support MH/SUD training for criminal legal system employees

Congress should provide federal incentives for the education and training of criminal legal system employees on mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) signs, which should include the practice of occasional screenings on MH/SUD and suicide risk.[1][2][3]

The number of incarcerated individuals with a mental health or substance use disorder (MH/SUD) continues to increase and conditions in correctional facilities can exacerbate these issues.[4] Many criminal legal system employees lack the necessary training to support an incarcerated individual with MH/SUD.[5] Similar to the recruitment incentives currently available through the Bureau of Prisons, there should be a federal incentive for criminal legal system employees to obtain training on MH/SUD issues and screening techniques.[1][2][3][6] With the knowledge, skills, and understanding to successfully identify and screen for MH/SUD,[5] employees can identify individuals in crisis and provide more appropriate interventions.[7]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Have a Question About the Strategy? Want to Get Involved?

If you'd like to provide input to future iterations of the National Strategy, ask a question about our recommendations, or make an organizational commitment to the Alignment for Progress, please reach out today.

Diverse Workforce
Research & Technology
Parity, Coverage, & Equitable Access
Emergency & Crisis Response
Prevention, Early Intervention, & Youth
Infrastructure
Environmental Justice
Employment
Transportation
Education
Food Security
Housing Security
Economic Security
Youth
Women
Veterans
Sexual and Gender Minorities/LGBTQ+
Legal System-Involved Individuals
Rural Communities
People with Physical Disabilities
Older Adults
People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Immigrants/Refugees
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African American
People with Autism
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Active Military
Federal Employee Health Plans
TRICARE
Individual ACA Plans
Employer Sponsored Plans
CHIP
Medicare
Medicaid
Support Services
Telehealth
Integration
Measurement-based Care
Value-based Care
Remedies for Violations
Network Adequacy/Timely Access
Medical Necessity Determinations
Covered Benefits
Parity/Treatment Limitations
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Veterans Affairs
Treasury
Labor
Justice
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeland Security
Health and Human Services
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Education
Defense
Commerce
Agriculture
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
House Veterans' Affairs Committee
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
House Small Business Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
House Natural Resources Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
House Financial Services Committee
House Appropriations Committee
House Agriculture Committee
House Education and Workforce Committee
House Budget Committee
House Energy and Commerce Committee
House Armed Services Committee
Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
Senate Finance Committee
Senate Indian Affairs Committee
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Senate Armed Services Committee
Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Senate Budget Committee
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee