Alignment for Progress: 
A National Strategy for Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

It’s time for a meaningful national conversation about mental health and substance use care. We must remove the barriers to equitable and available coverage for these conditions so people can get the help they need.

Welcome To The 
National Strategy

Want to understand more about the importance of building a National Strategy for Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders?

How Content Is Organized and How Best to Search/Sort the Recommendations

The National Strategy recommendations are organized by category, with impacted populations and topical areas providing additional nuance and the ability to narrow a search. We have also included the option to search recommendations by the relevant House and Senate committees of jurisdiction.

Recommendation Selection Methodologies and Criteria

After conducting a thorough review of the federal policy landscape, The Kennedy Forum team created this first-of-its-kind compilation of policy recommendations needed to transform our mental health and substance use systems. The recommendations have been sourced and vetted from numerous organizations, advocates, and experts across the country in order to capture a robust set of recommendations for lawmakers and federal agencies to act on.

All National Strategy Recommendations

These featured recommendations are highlighted based on their importance in beginning the national movement towards better care for everyone.

submit
Clear All
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
Clear all
Topics
Areas of Focus
Population
Federal Department
Social Determinants of Health
Coverage & Standards
House Committees
Senate Committees
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Filters
LOADING more RECOMMENDATIONS
No results found.
If you see a loading symbol on your screen, more results are on the way! Otherwise, try different search/filter criteria.

Fund the Comprehensive Suicide Prevention Program

Congress should authorize and fund the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Comprehensive Suicide Prevention Program (CSP)[1] so it can be expanded to all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and 18 tribal and territorial jurisdictions.[2]

Suicide is a leading cause of death in the United States, accounting for more than 48,000 deaths in 2021.[3] Suicide affects all ages, particularly youth ages 10-14 and young adults ages 20-34. Some groups, including veterans, people living in rural areas, and young people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBTQ+), have higher rates of suicide.[4]

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Comprehensive Suicide Prevention Program (CSP) funds programs to implement and evaluate a public health approach to suicide prevention. This includes convening and connecting multi-sector partners; using data to understand contributors to and track trends in suicide and suicidal behavior; identifying gaps in existing strategies; and sharing data and outcomes with other partners.[5] However, the CSP currently funds programs in only seventeen states.[1] Expanding the CSP to all fifty states, the District of Columbia and eighteen tribal and territorial jurisdictions will support the CDC’s goal of reducing suicide by 20 percent by 2025.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Streamline mental health services for Veterans

Congress should ensure that all Veterans of the U.S. military, regardless of where they live, can access critical health care services, including for mental health and substance use disorders (MH/SUDs). Congress should also continue to streamline the complicated and burdensome application process for disability benefits.

Every Veteran of the U.S. military, especially those with visible and invisible wounds of war, should have access to high-quality services and supports, including for MH/SUDs. Congress should work to close gaps in services, including for Veterans who live in U.S. Territories (Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa) and U.S.-affiliated Pacific Islands that are freely-associated states (the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau). Individuals from U.S. territories are U.S. citizens, while individuals from freely-associated states are eligible to come to the U.S. as nonimmigrants to work and live indefinitely.[1] The U.S. is currently investing billions of dollars in military installations on these Pacific Islands as part of the U.S. geostrategic pivot to Asia.[2]

Nearly 3 percent of all U.S. Veterans live in U.S. territories, and Veterans make up nearly 8 percent of Guam’s population and more than 5 percent in American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico has more than 80,000 Veterans.[3] Given the high proportion of Veterans, Congress must do more to ensure the availability of services across U.S. territories. Currently, the nearest Veterans Affairs Medical Center to Guam is 4,000 miles away in Hawaii.[2]

While Veterans in freely-associated states are entitled to care, Congress should pass the Care for Compact of Free Association (COFA) Veterans Act to allow the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to provide services in the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau and to compensate Veterans for the cost of travel to receive needed health care services.[4] In June 2023, the U.S. Secretary of State Anthony J. Blinken and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland requested that Congress make these essential changes to help these U.S. Veterans access services.[5]

More broadly, Congress should work with the VA to streamline the process of applying for VA benefits, which is notoriously complex and frequently requires help to navigate.[6] One issue is that the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has a wide variety of different, complicated authorities that limit which Veterans are eligible to receive different benefits. Congress should work with the VHA to streamline these authorities and simplify eligibility requirements to help reduce the bureaucracy, thereby improving the efficiency of service delivery and increasing Veterans’ access to MH/SUD services and supports.

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Fund NICUs to provide care for infants with NAS

Congress should utilize tax credits and grant programs to fund new (or existing) newborn intensive care units in all hospitals to provide specialized care for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and ensure mothers and their children remain in close proximity with each other after birth.[1]

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a group of conditions that can occur when newborns withdraw from certain substances, including opioids, that they were exposed to before birth.[2][3] Approximately 7 percent of women self-report using prescription opioid pain relievers while pregnant; of those, one in five report misuse of prescription opioids.[4][5] Six newborns are diagnosed with NAS for every 1,000 newborn hospital stays, equivalent to one baby diagnosed with NAS every 24 minutes or more than 59 newborns diagnosed every day.[4][6][7] The number of babies born with NAS increased by 117 percent nationally from 2009 to 2020.[6]

Recent studies found that newborns diagnosed with NAS who stay with their mothers after delivery, (i.e., “room-in,”) have better outcomes than those who go to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).[8][9][10] Babies with NAS who room-in with their mothers are far less likely to need pharmacological interventions and leave the hospital days sooner than those who remain in the NICU.[8][9][10] Rooming-in and other non-pharmacologic interventions, such as creating a low-stimulation environment, swaddling, and feeding on demand, should be the evidence-based standard of care for newborns with NAS.[1][8][9][10][11][12]

Hospitals may not have the infrastructure to keep mothers and babies in the same room.[13] Therefore, incentives are needed – including tax credits and grant programs – to fund new and existing efforts within the NICU so mothers and infants with NAS remain together immediately following birth.[1]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Reinstitute the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring program

The Administration should reinstitute the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program to improve data collection and provide resources for other promising surveillance systems.[1]

In 1998, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) launched the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program to expand and restructure[2] its predecessor, the Drug Use Forecasting program, which was in place from 1987-1997.[3] ADAM collected data from adult male arrestees to help monitor drug use trends.[4] ADAM provided an objective biological measure of drug use and self-reported use among those arrested and charged with crimes.[4] The NIJ collected ADAM data between 1998-2003[4] and the Office of National Drug Control Policy reinstated ADAM data collection (as ADAM II) in 2007 with a reduced number of data collection sites.[4] ADAM data has not been collected since 2013, when the program was discontinued.

Data informs decisions in public health by tracking better, faster, and more actionable insights.[5] Centralized data collection repositories like ADAM aid in sharing outcomes, trends, and insights in addressing drug use within this population. ADAM data provided critical information for policymakers at local and federal levels to assess trends of use and impact of public programs.[6]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Pass the STRIP Act

Congress should pass the STRIP Act to amend the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) to exempt individuals from punishment for the possession, sale, or purchase of fentanyl drug testing equipment.

Fentanyl test strips are small strips of paper that can detect the presence of fentanyl in multiple kinds of drugs.[1] In 2021, overdose deaths due to fentanyl rose 26 percent from the previous year, reaching over 67,000.[2] The rapid rise in fentanyl-related deaths has been driven by the increasing presence of fentanyl in many drugs. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has reported a rapid rise in fentanyl-laced pills that can appear legitimate that, in fact, contain a potentially lethal amount of fentanyl.[3] In April 2023, the Biden Administration announced a multi-factored approach to disrupt fentanyl supply chains into the United States.[4] However, the problem remains that fentanyl testing strips are illegal in a handful of states.[5] The CDC recommends test strips as a means of saving lives and preventing drug overdoses.[1] Congress should pass the bipartisan STRIP Act to remove fentanyl test strips from the CSA, as well as increase funding to public health agencies to scale up the range of public health approaches, including fentanyl test strips, that are critical to saving lives.[6]

Topics

social determinants of health

Population

coverage & Standards

Federal Department

house committees

Senate committees

Have a Question About the Strategy? Want to Get Involved?

If you'd like to provide input to future iterations of the National Strategy, ask a question about our recommendations, or make an organizational commitment to the Alignment for Progress, please reach out today.

Diverse Workforce
Research & Technology
Parity, Coverage, & Equitable Access
Emergency & Crisis Response
Prevention, Early Intervention, & Youth
Infrastructure
Environmental Justice
Employment
Transportation
Education
Food Security
Housing Security
Economic Security
Youth
Women
Veterans
Sexual and Gender Minorities/LGBTQ+
Legal System-Involved Individuals
Rural Communities
People with Physical Disabilities
Older Adults
People with Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (IDD)
Immigrants/Refugees
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African American
People with Autism
Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI)
American Indian/Alaskan Native
Active Military
Federal Employee Health Plans
TRICARE
Individual ACA Plans
Employer Sponsored Plans
CHIP
Medicare
Medicaid
Support Services
Telehealth
Integration
Measurement-based Care
Value-based Care
Remedies for Violations
Network Adequacy/Timely Access
Medical Necessity Determinations
Covered Benefits
Parity/Treatment Limitations
Department of Transportation (DOT)
Veterans Affairs
Treasury
Labor
Justice
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Homeland Security
Health and Human Services
Executive Office of the President (EOP)
Education
Defense
Commerce
Agriculture
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee
House Ways and Means Committee
House Veterans' Affairs Committee
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
House Small Business Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
House Natural Resources Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Homeland Security Committee
House Financial Services Committee
House Appropriations Committee
House Agriculture Committee
House Budget Committee
House Education and Workforce Committee
House Energy and Commerce Committee
House Armed Services Committee
Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Senate Judiciary Committee
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Senate Special Committee on Aging
Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee
Senate Finance Committee
Senate Indian Affairs Committee
Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Senate Armed Services Committee
Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee
Senate Budget Committee
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee